USEF's PER national ratings equivalent - Junior 1.10M jumper

The same amount of accumulated points over 15 to 19 shows competed or 5 doesn't tell the same story. Both stories are equally valuable. PER's side of the story has been missing in the equation if one is interested in Performance Efficiency Ratings.

Rider and horse combos competing in the jumper ring are ranked by their performance efficiency in the ring (time & faults) - there should be a final season ranking reflecting exactly that: performance efficiency! Amount of participation should not majorly or solely carry the end results or season's rankings. We are missing a huge component in the rankings as is.

We can and should all start applying the simple metric and better understand the performance efficiency of our seasons! We can join each other in celebration on social media and cheer each other" PER achievements on with virtual ribbons for the much deserved and currently missing recognition. Our biggest hope and goal is for official ranking entities to simply add an easy column to their rankings including performance efficiency next to the total points accumulated in a show season- in order to highlight and also celebrate performance efficiency in the ranking structure.