• PER Home
  • USHJA's PER ratings
  • USEF's PER ratings
  • PER Sponsors
Zone 5 Junior Jumper standings through July 2026 with points, comps, and PER.

>> THE THRILL OF Performance EfficienCY RATING

PER applied to USHJA's ZONE 5 JUNIOR JUMPER current STANDINGS

A Performance Rating that looks at Efficiency over Participation or Quantity.

These standings are taken mid season, meaning most competitors haven't met the minimum amount of 8 A rated shows yet, so they are in the process of building their PER show rating standings by end of season! In the meanwhile, it give them a good provisional temperature gage of where they at - in comparison to their fellow competitors in same division and hight!

PER for ALL!

Anyone can easily check their own PER rating to evaluate where they are at competitively and performance wise without having to invest and keep up with volume of shows. Note the PER ratings become eligible at a minimum of 8 A rated shows per season.

< back home

>>

Rider and horse combos competing in the jumper ring are ranked by their performance efficiency in the ring (time & faults) - there should be a final season ranking reflecting exactly that: performance efficiency! Amount of participation should not majorly or solely carry the end results or season's rankings. We are missing a huge component in the rankings as is.


We can and should all start applying the simple metric and better understand the performance efficiency of our seasons! We can join each other in celebration on social media and cheer each other" PER achievements on with virtual ribbons for the much deserved and currently missing recognition. Our biggest hope and goal is for official ranking entities to simply add an easy column to their rankings including performance efficiency next to the total points accumulated in a show season- in order to highlight and also celebrate performance efficiency in the ranking structure.

Leveling the playing field

Only adding/accumulating points from a rider that was able to participate in 24 shows over the year, along with those that could barely attend 8 only ends up rewarding "participation over performance efficiency" (quantity over quality.) 

Quantity is certainly a merit in and of itself but should NOT be the sole and determining winning factor.

<< back home

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2026 Performance Efficiency Rating - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept